Legal Opinion

Byrnes v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided August 8, 1966No. C. D. 2746PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nichols, Judge:

The merchandise involved in this protest, imported from Japan in 1963, consists of three small metal articles resembling miniature fencing foils with hilts and handles, but stated to be skewers for broiling meat. Lengths including handles are approximately 7Yz, 9, and 13 inches. They were classed under paragraph 397 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Sixth Protocol of Supplementary Concessions to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T.D. 54108, which reads in pertinent part as follows:

Articles or wages not specially provided for, whether partly or wholly…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Royal Cathay Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  2. Shoten v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1939
  3. D. E. Sanford Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
  4. Lipman's v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
  5. Stor-All Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. New York Merchandise Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  2. Staalkat of America, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  3. Marmax Trading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  4. Voss Int. Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  5. Maui Varieties, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API