Royal Cathay Trading Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Nichols, Judge:
The merchandise involved in these cases, consolidated at the trial, consists of various articles of rattancore or rattancore and peel imported from Hong Kong and entered at the port of San Francisco in 1957, 1958, and 1962.1 The articles, except for item No. 4203 (protest No. 59/25702), were assessed with duty at 45 per centum or 42% per centum ad valorem under paragraph 411 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Sixth Protocol of Supplementary Concessions to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T.D. 54108, as baskets wholly or in chief value of wood. It is…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- F. B. Vandegrift & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
- United States v. Basket Importing Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
- Quon Quon Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
- Transcontinental Petroleum Co. v. Interocean Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1919
- Quon Quon Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Novelty Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
- Byrnes v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
- New York Merchandise Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
- Voss Int. Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
- Warren Atlantic, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.