Stor-All Corp. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Rao, Judge:
The five protests enumerated in the schedule of protests, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been consolidated for purposes of -trial. *413They relate to certain imported metal parts for barbecue grills, which were assessed with duty at the rate of 19 per centum ad valorem, pursuant to the provision in paragraph 397 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Sixth Protocol of Supplementary Concessions to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 91 Treas. Dec. 150, T.D. 54108, for articles of base metal, not specially provided for. It is the claim of plaintiff that said…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Shoten v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1939
- D. E. Sanford Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
3Cited by6 opinions
- Byrnes v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
- Lipman's v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
- Wiley v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
- Gloy's Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
- Lipman's v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.