Legal Opinion

D. E. Sanford Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided July 2, 1959No. 63217; protest 265345-K (San Francisco)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rao, Judge:

Plaintiff is the importer of certain cast-iron cooking pots, known as “Hibachi” stoves, which were assessed with duty at the rate of 22% per centum ad valorem pursuant to the provision in paragraph 397 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 82 Treas. Dec. 305, T.D. 51802, for articles of iron, not specially provided for. It is here claimed that said stoves are dutiable at the rate of 12% per centum ad *297valorem, as iron cooking stoves of the household type, within the provisions of said paragraph 397, as modified by the Torquay Protocol…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Shoten v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1939

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Byrnes v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  2. Stor-All Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
  3. Anderson Heating, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  4. Wiley v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  5. Ross v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API