Legal Opinion

Brennan v. Board of Supervisors

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 1, 1981No. Civ. 46695PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

NEWSOM, J.

We are asked to review a trial court order which enjoined distribution of a ballot proposition summary of Proposition U. In accordance with applicable municipal laws, a ballot proposition summary of a proposition entitled “San Francisco Renter’s Property Tax Rebate Ordinance of 1978”—was prepared by “The Ballot Simplification Committee” (hereinafter Committee).

Prior to the election, respondent filed a petition for writ of mandate challenging the legality of the digest for Proposition U, and seeking to enjoin distribution of the pamphlet until the digest was corrected to…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Amador Valley Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn.California Supreme Court · 1974
  3. People v. FriersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Agricultural Labor Relations Board v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Faulkner v. California Toll Bridge AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. People v. ValenciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  2. People v. FloresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  3. Lungren v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. PEOPLE EX REL. KERR v. County of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  5. Monette-Shaw v. San Francisco Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API