Legal Opinion
Rehart v. Klossner
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 26, 1941No. Civ. 2792PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment quieting plaintiff’s title to real property in Ventura County. This is a companion case to Rehart et al. v. Klossner, ante, p. 40, the opinion in which is this day filed, but different property is involved.
Under date of August 15, 1932, R. L. Rehart and Stella M. Rehart, husband and wife, entered into an oil lease with John D. Young on the property in question. Certain terms of the lease were modified by a contract between the same parties dated June 1st, 1933. We will summarize the terms of the two instruments as though the amendatory clauses had been…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McConnell v. Corona City Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
- Sobelman v. MaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Atkinson v. District Bond Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
- Tomboy Gold & Copper Co. v. MarksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Felton Chemical Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Guerrieri v. SeveriniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- STC, INC. v. City of BillingsMontana Supreme Court · 1975
- Coleman v. MoraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Alphonzo E. Bell Corp. v. ListleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946