Legal Opinion

Popovich v. O'Neal

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 22, 1963No. Civ. 237PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

Plaintiffs-appellants own real property in the upper foothill area of Madera County. Respondents, who are both defendants and cross-complainants, own land north and south of appellants’ property, although on the south there is an intervening parcel of land lying between that of appellants and respondents, which is owned by a person named as a defendant in the original action but who has not appealed.

Before 1900 and at a time when all of the property involved herein was located within Fresno County, a right of way for road purposes was deeded to the county by the predecessors in interest of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Berniker v. BernikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. O'BANION v. BorbaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Glatts v. HensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Highland Realty Co. v. City of San RafaelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Serrano v. GrissomCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Guerra v. PackardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  2. Vieira Enterprises, Inc. v. McCoyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  3. Busby v. State ex rel. HermanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  4. Masin v. La MarcheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  5. Valles v. Kim CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API