Legal Opinion
Kaufman v. Shoenberg
Court of Chancery of Delaware
Decided October 21, 1952PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
91 A.2d 786 (1952)
KAUFMAN
v.
SHOENBERG et al.
Court of Chancery of Delaware, New Castle.
October 21, 1952.
Stanley L. Kaufman, of Kaufman, Imberman & Taylor, and Joshua Peterfreund, New York City, and William Marvel, of Morford, Bennethum, Marvel & Cooch, Wilmington, for plaintiff.
Albert R. Connelly and Edward C. Perkins, of Cravath, Swaine & Moore, New York City, and Caleb S. Layton and Henry M. Canby, of Richards, Layton & Finger, Wilmington, for defendants.
SEITZ, Chancellor.
I am required to determine the validity of defendant corporation's stock option plan.
Plaintiff, common stockholder,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kerbs v. California Eastern Airways, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1952
- Gottlieb v. Heyden Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1952
- Gottlieb v. Heyden Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1952
- Kaufman v. ShoenbergCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1952
- Kerbs v. California Eastern Airways, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1952
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- International Insurance Co., a Corporation v. Alfred M. Johns, James W. McFadden Thomas v. Ogletree, Richard W. Sherman, and G. Paul WhortonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- Harbor Finance Partners v. HuizengaCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1999
- Elster v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1953
- Sample v. MorganCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2007
- Citron v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1990
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.