Legal Opinion
Kersting v. Royal-Milbank Insurance
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided May 22, 1990No. C6-89-1987PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
Appellant Royal-Milbank Insurance maintains that the trial court erred in concluding that the “collateral source statute” does not apply to reduce an arbitrator’s underinsured motorist award by the amount of “accident and sickness” benefits paid the victim by his employer. Respondent Joseph Kersting argues that the trial court should have added statutory interest to the arbitrator’s award from the date of that award. We affirm.
FACTS
Joseph Kersting was the owner and driver of a vehicle struck in the rear by a pickup owned by Raymond Joki and driven by his son. Liability…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- McDonald v. City of West BranchSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Schmidt v. ClothierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Johnson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Aufderhar v. Data Dispatch, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Murphy v. Milbank Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Western National Mutual Insurance Co. v. CasperSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Erickson v. Great American Insurance CompaniesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- Austin v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- Ray v. City of Maple GroveCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- National Avenue Building Co. v. StewartMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.