Legal Opinion

Kohn v. La Manufacture Francaise Des Pneumatiques Michelin

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 22, 1991No. C8-91-873, CX-91-874PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

A product manufacturer and designer appeal the trial court’s denial of an alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) or new trial on a jury determination of product defect. We affirm the trial court’s rulings on the admissibility of tire compression test results, the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict, and the denial of a collateral source reduction. The French design company separately appeals the denial of JNOV for lack of personal jurisdiction, and we reverse.

FACTS

Mark Kohn was seriously injured when he attempted to mount a…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re DES CasesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1992
  2. Bergherr v. SommerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
  3. Mark Christinson and Denise Christinson v. Big Stone County Co-Op, a Minnesota Cooperative AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  4. Welsh v. Takekawa Iron Works Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
  5. Ashley v. Abbott LaboratoriesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API