Legal Opinion

State v. . Vanderlip

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 21, 1945PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Tbe statute under which the defendant was tried provides that “Any parent who willfully neglects or who refuses to support and maintain his or her illegitimate child shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and subject to such penalties as are hereinafter provided.” Willfulness of the neglect or refusal to provide adequate means of support of the illegitimate child is one of the essential elements of the offense, and must be charged in the warrant. S. v. Cook, 207 N. C., 261, 176 S. E., 757; S. v. McLamb, 214 N. C., 322, 199 S. E., 81.

The motion in arrest of judgment should have been allowed, S. v.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. . CookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  2. State v. . TarltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  3. State v. . ClarkeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  4. State v. . McLambSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  5. Rowland v. Farmers BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. HammondsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. State v. . MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  3. State v. CochranSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  4. State v. DoughtieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. State v. EllisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API