Legal Opinion

State v. . McLamb

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 19, 1938PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cueiam.

The Attorney-General lodged motion to dismiss the appeal under Rule 19 of this Court for reason that the record does not show the organization of the court below or the jurisdiction thereof. This motion may be well bottomed and warrant the dismissal of the appeal. However, where “a serious question is presented,” this Court has “sometimes not dismissed.” S. v. May, 118 N. C., 1204. A question serious at least to the defendant is here presented, namely, whether he must serve sentence of six months imprisonment. Under the circumstances divulged upon the imperfect record we feel…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. . CookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  2. State v. . TarltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  3. State v. . MaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. . MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  2. State v. . VanderlipSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  3. State v. . ClarkeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  4. State v. . CloughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  5. State v. CloughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API