Legal Opinion

State v. . Clarke

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 19, 1941PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeviN, J.

The statute under which the defendant was tried provides that, “Any parent who willfully neglects or who refuses to support and maintain bis or ber illegitimate child shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and subject to such penalties as are hereinafter provided.”

"Willfulness is one of the essential elements of the offense. This must be charged in the warrant, S. v. Cook, 207 N. C., 261, 176 S. E., 757; S. v. Spillman, 210 N. C., 271, 186 S. E., 322. Its omission is not cured by C. S., 4623, S. v. Tyson, 208 N. C., 231, 180 S. E., 85, or by amendment after verdict, S. v. Tarlton, 208 N. C., 734,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. . CookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  2. State v. . SpillmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  3. State v. . TarltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  4. State v. . TysonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  5. State v. . McLambSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. . MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  2. State v. DoughtieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. Lovegrove v. LovegroveSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. State v. . VanderlipSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  5. State v. CoppedgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API