Legal Opinion
Confidential Informant 59-05071 v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided December 11, 2012No. 11-153CPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RCFC 37(a)(3) Motion to Compel Production of Documents; Attorney-Client Privilege; Work-Product Doctrine; Deliberative Process Privilege; Investigatory Files Privilege
OPINION
HEWITT, Chief Judge
The parties dispute whether various assertions of privilege by the United States (the government or defendant) constitute a proper basis for withholding from discovery certain documents requested by Confidential Informant 59-05071 (Pat Doe or plaintiff). See Order of Oct. 19, 2012, Docket Number (Dkt. No.) 38, at 2 (filed under seal). Pursuant to the court’s Order of October 19, 2012, the parties have…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Environmental Protection Agency v. MinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. ZolinSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Therasense, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson and Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Cameron Lanning Cormack v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Confidential Informant 59-05071 v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Fairholme Funds, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Confidential Informant 59-05071 v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Estes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.