Legal Opinion
Fairholme Funds, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided September 20, 2016No. 13-465CPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Motion to Compel Discovery; RCFC 26(b); Presidential Communications Privilege; Deliberative Process Privilege; Bank Examination Privilege; In Camera Review; Vaughn Index
OPINION AND ORDER
SWEENEY, Judge
Before the court is plaintiffs’ motion to compel the production of documents currently being withheld, by defendant on the grounds of (1) the presidential eommunica- tions privilege, (2) the deliberative process privilege, (3) the bank examination privilege, or (4) a combination thereof. Following an in camera review of a sample of the disputed documents, and for the reasons set forth below, the…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Robert G. Vaughn v. Bernard Rosen, Executive Director, United States Civil Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Cheney v. United States District Court for District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Caddell Construction Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Fairholme Funds, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- In re Fin. Oversight & Mgmt. Bd. for Puerto RicoUnited States District Court · 2019
- Fairholme Funds, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Fairholme Funds, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.