Introducing Exa PlacesLearn more
Legal Opinion

Cameron Lanning Cormack v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided August 21, 2014No. 1:13-cv-00232PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Patent case; motion to compel production of documents .claimed to be protected against disclosure by attorney-client privilege

OPINION AND ORDER

LETTOW, Judge.

In this patent case, defendant-intervenor, Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation (“Northrop Grumman Systems” or “Systems”) seeks from plaintiff, Mr. Cameron Lanning Cormaek, production in discovery of a set of documents comprising correspondence and communications related to the patent prosecution of U.S. Patent No. 7,781,693 (“the ’693 patent”), the patent at issue. 1 Mi-. Cormaek contends that the documents are protected against…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Gomez v. VernonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  3. In Re Echostar Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  4. In Re: Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
  5. Fort James Corporation v. Solo Cup CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Towne Place Condo. Ass'n v. Phila. Indem. Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
  2. Uusi, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  3. Cameron Lanning Cormack v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  4. Cameron Lanning Cormack v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  5. Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2024

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API