Legal Opinion

Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 13, 1948No. Civ. 16396PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

February 20, 1947, Mae Raymond was in the employ of petitioner’s insured, Rothschild & Kaufman Company, whose factory was located at 931 East Pico Street in Los Angeles. While sitting at and operating a power machine for her employer an explosion occurred at an electroplating establishment across the street at 922. Her machine was stationed about a foot from the west wall of her employer’s building. She did not see or hear anything but a flash of light just before losing consciousness. On awakening a steel-framed window was pressed upon her head and shoulders. It had been blown from the west…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Kern v. Southport Mill, Ltd.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1932
  2. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. CardilloCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  3. Caswell's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  4. Claim of Kowalek v. New York Consolidated RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  5. Bartlett Hayward Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Brookhaven Steam Laundry v. WattsMississippi Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Argonaut Ins. Co. v. Workmen's Comp. Appeals Bd.California Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. Madin v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Perez v. Fred Harvey, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Huston v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API