Legal Opinion

Kern v. Southport Mill, Ltd.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 29, 1932No. 31564PublishedCited by 202 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSt. Paul, J.

This is a claim for Workmen’s Compensation ; allowed by the district judge, denied by the Court of Appeal; which we have concluded to investigate.

Plaintiff was employed by defendant as a pipe fitter at a wage of $33 per week. He was directed to do some outside work and then return to the mill. On returning he stepped out of a street car into the path of an automobile ; was struck down, and permanently and totally injured; and now claims compensation.

I

The first question is: Were his injuries sustained whilst he was “performing services arising out of and incidental to his employment in the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Cudahy Packing Co. Of Nebraska v. ParramoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Myers v. Louisiana Ry. & Nav. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
  3. Byas v. Hotel Bentley, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
  4. Dyer v. Rapides Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
  5. Ferguson v. Cady-McFarland Gravel Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1924

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by202 opinions

  1. Guidry v. Sline Indus. Painters, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1982
  2. Mundy v. Dept. of Health & Human ResourcesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
  3. Guillory v. Interstate Gas StationSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1995
  4. McLin v. Industrial Specialty ContractorsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
  5. Benoit v. Capitol Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1993

197 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API