Legal Opinion

United Supply & Manufacturing Co. v. Cornelison Engine Maintenance Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 5, 1963No. 40181PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BERRY, Justice.

The parties here will be referred to as follows: Defendant in error, Cornelison Engine Maintenance Company, a corporation, will be designated “Cornelison”; plaintiff in error, United Supply and Manufacturing Company, a corporation, will be designated “United”; plaintiffs in error, Dudley and Heath Drilling Co., a co-partnership, composed of Jackson C. Dudley and B. M. Heath, will be designated “Dudley & Heath”; and Novak Drilling Company, a corporation, will be referred to as “Novak”.

This action was brought in the lower court by Cornelison, as claimant, under a mechanics and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wilson Motor Co. v. DunnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  2. Stuart v. ColemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  3. Chadwell v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  4. United Tire & Investment Co. v. MaxwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  5. Kirkpatrick v. Oil Well Supply Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. White v. WensauerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API