United Supply & Manufacturing Co. v. Cornelison Engine Maintenance Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
BERRY, Justice.
The parties here will be referred to as follows: Defendant in error, Cornelison Engine Maintenance Company, a corporation, will be designated “Cornelison”; plaintiff in error, United Supply and Manufacturing Company, a corporation, will be designated “United”; plaintiffs in error, Dudley and Heath Drilling Co., a co-partnership, composed of Jackson C. Dudley and B. M. Heath, will be designated “Dudley & Heath”; and Novak Drilling Company, a corporation, will be referred to as “Novak”.
This action was brought in the lower court by Cornelison, as claimant, under a mechanics and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wilson Motor Co. v. DunnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Stuart v. ColemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Chadwell v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- United Tire & Investment Co. v. MaxwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
- Kirkpatrick v. Oil Well Supply Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- White v. WensauerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985