Legal Opinion
Kirkpatrick v. Oil Well Supply Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 14, 1935No. 24234PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPhelps, J.
Orville Lee, Inc., owned a truck and mortgaged it to the plaintiff corporation, which recorded the mortgage. Subsequently Orville Lee, Inc., placed the truck in possession of defendants for repair and agreed with defendants that they should retain possession of the truck as security for payment of the repair bill. Defendants made the repairs and filed their lien statement therefor. The defendants were still in possession of said truck, as pledgees, when plaintiff filed this action of replevin against them for the possession of the truck. Orville Lee, Inc., was not a party to the action.
The…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lindley v. KellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Kesler and Dodson v. CheadleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
- Waldock v. First Nat. Bank of IdabelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- First National Bank of Mountain View v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Richardson v. Parker, McConnell & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Williams v. First National Bank & Trust Co. of VinitaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
- Liberty Plan Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
- United Supply & Manufacturing Co. v. Cornelison Engine Maintenance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
- In re Golconda FarmsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada · 1981