Rose v. Richardson
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
*944Opinion
TURNER, P. J.
I. Introduction
This is a family law “move away” case. Tara Rose (mother) and Scott James Richardson (father) cross-appeal from custody and visitation orders as to their minor son, Christopher Scott Richardson.1 The trial court issued a move away order after refusing to conduct a de novo review of the relevant facts and circumstances. In the published portion of this opinion, we address the question of whether a custody stipulation entered into by the parties constituted a “final judicial custody determination” within the meaning of Montenegro v. Diaz (2001) 26 Cal.4th 249,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Davey v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
- In Re Marriage of BurgessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Yarrow v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Fox v. FoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Burchard v. GarayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re Marriage of LaMusgaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- F.T. v. L.J.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- People v. NeidingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Samson v. SamsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Navarro v. LamusgaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.