Legal Opinion
People v. Ranger Insurance
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 16, 2003No. C041065PublishedCited by 3 opinions
[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BLEASE, Acting P. J.
Defendant Ranger Insurance Company (Ranger) appeals from an order which denied the discharge of an order of forfeiture and the exoneration of bail. Ranger contends the order was invalid because notice was not given to “the bail,” as required by Penal Code section 1305, subdivision (c)(4), prior to reinstatement of the bail bond. 1
Ranger contends that “the bail” refers to the surety for the bail but does not include the bail agent. We disagree on the ground that, although “the bail” refers to the surety, the “bail agent” may accept notice of reinstatement for the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sawyer v. BarbourCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- McDermott v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Groves v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- People v. Landon White Bail BondsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- County of Madera v. Ranger InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dowell v. Biosense Webster, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- County of Orange v. Lexington National InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- People v. Accredited Surety and Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 2022