Southern Pacific Pipe Lines, Inc. v. State Board of Equalization
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GODOY PEREZ, J.
This appeal raises the question, to what extent may private oil company pipelines which run through more than one county be centrally assessed by the State Board of Equalization. For the reasons stated below, we affirm the trial court’s judgment, as modified, and hold that lands and rights-of-way through which such pipelines run must be locally assessed and taxed and that only the line itself and certain items necessary to its operation may be centrally assessed.
Facts and Procedural History
This tax refund action arises out of 15 consolidated lawsuits by various oil and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bowers v. BernardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Estate of TeedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Bruce v. GregoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- ITT World Communications, Inc. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Gilgert v. Stockton Port DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hirshfield v. SchwartzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Smith v. Selma Community HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Rancho Pauma Mutual Water Co. v. Yuima Municipal Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- In re La Paloma Generating Co.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2018
- Fujitsu IT Holdings, Inc. v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.