Legal Opinion

Converse Rubber Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided August 30, 1972No. C.D. 4374PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ford, Judge:

This case is a rehearing, having originally been decided in 65 Cust. Ct. 453, C.D. 4121 (1970), and involves a multiple station rotary table injection molding machine which was classified under the provisions of item 678.35, Tariff Schedules of the United States, as machines used for molding or otherwise forming rubber or plastics articles and parts and assessed with duty at 11.5 per centum ad valorem. It is contended that said machine is entitled to entry free of duty under the provisions for shoe machinery and parts as provided for in item 678.10.

In our original opinion we made…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. C. H. Powell Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  2. Converse Rubber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pistorino & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1978
  2. Theo. H. Davies & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
  3. E. Dillingham, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API