Legal Opinion

E. Dillingham, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 24, 1975No. Court Nos. 62/15969Published

1Opinion of the Court

Foed, Judge:

The merchandise at bar consists of various molds used with the Bata Monoplax Atlas Unit (hereinafter called the Bata Monoplax) for the production of footwear. The molds were imported from Canada during the years 1959-1963 and were assessed with duty under paragraph 353, Tariff Act of 1930, as modified, as parts of articles having as an essential feature an electrical element or device, and are claimed to be free of duty under paragraph 1643, as shoe machinery, in whole or in part.

The pertinent provisions of the tariff act are as follows:

Classification:

Paragraph 353, Tariff Act of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. W. A. Gleeson v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
  2. Rubberset Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
  3. Converse Rubber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
  4. E. Dillingham, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  5. E. Dillingham, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API