Legal Opinion

C. H. Powell Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided October 31, 1969No. C.D. 3912PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Donlon, Judge:

Two protests are here consolidated for purposes of trial. The merchandise of protest 67/36009 consists of a machine known as a Pedersen Rapid Beam Cutting Press, imported from Denmark on November 1,1963. The merchandise of protest 67/36016 consists of parts for a Pedersen press, imported from Denmark on March 2, 1964. Both importations were made for Allied Shoe Machinery Corporation, of Haverhill, Massachusetts, the ultimate consignee.

The claim here litigated is that the imported press and parts are shoe machinery and parts thereof, and that as such they are entitled to free…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hoffschlaeger Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  2. Foreign Products Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Converse Rubber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  2. Converse Rubber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
  3. E. Dillingham, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  4. Pistorino & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API