Legal Opinion
Eisenberg v. Tuchman
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 21, 2006No. AC 25745PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAVERY, C. J.
The defendant, Alma Tuchman, appeals from the judgment of the trial court effecting an equitable partition of property held by the defendant as a tenant in common with the plaintiffs David S. Eisenberg and Lucy T. Eisenberg, trustees of the David Eisenberg and Lucy Eisenberg living trust, and Jessica T. Matthews.1 The town of Greenwich (town) was permitted to intervene in this matter as a party plaintiff due to its agreement with the other plaintiffs to purchase whatever portion of the property they are awarded by virtue of this action.2 The defendant claims on appeal that…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United Technologies Corp. v. Town of East WindsorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Budney v. IvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- State v. State Employees' Review BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Lynch v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- Northeast Ct. Economic Alliance, Inc. v. ATC PartnershipSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Rissolo v. Betts Island Oyster Farms, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Green v. SimmonsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Hunting v. ChambersConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Colorado Korean Ass'n v. KOREAN SEN. ASS'N.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2006
- McNamara v. MossmanColorado Court of Appeals · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.