Legal Opinion
Roy Sastrom v. Psychiatric Security Review Board
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 27, 2007No. AC 27329PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
The plaintiff, Roy Sastrom, appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing his appeal from the decision of the defendant, the psychiatric security review board. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly determined that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction to consider his claim that § 17a-581-44 of the Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies 1 is invalid because it conflicts with General Statutes § 17a-599. 2 We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The record reveals the following undisputed facts and procedural history relevant to the issues in…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Burinskas v. Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Commissioner of Transportation v. Rocky Mountain, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Chatterjee v. Commissioner of Revenue ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Nine State Street, LLC v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Hopkins v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sastrom v. Psychiatric Security Review BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Marulli v. Wood Frame Construction Co., LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Vasquez v. Superior CourtConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Levine v. Psychiatric Security Review BoardConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Sastrom v. Psychiatric Security Review BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007