City of Schenectady v. New York State Off-Track Pari-Mutuel Betting Commission
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGeorge L. Cobb, J.
Respondent moves to dismiss the instant proceeding as a matter of law upon the basis that from the face of the petition it appears that it is prematurely brought, that no question reviewable in an article 78 proceeding has been raised, and that the petition does not state a cause of action. While not expressed in such terms, this motion to dismiss upon ‘ ‘ objections in point of law ” (CPLR 7804, subd. [f]) is in the nature of a demurrer (Matter of Board of Educ. of City School Dist. of City of Mount Vernon v. Allen, 32 A D 2d 985). Upon such a motion, all of the allegations of the petition…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gimprich v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- In re Donner-Hanna Coke Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
- Matter of Donner-Hanna Coke CorporationNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- People ex rel. Bloy v. WalkerNew York Supreme Court · 1920
- Lehmann v. Kingston Plaza, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bruno v. CoddNew York Supreme Court · 1977
- Sorichetti v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1978