Legal Opinion
Lehmann v. Kingston Plaza, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 20, 1964PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLawrence H. Cooke, J.
In this action purportedly to foreclose a mechanic’s lien, defendant Kingston Plaza, Inc., moves “ for a judgment dismissing the complaint herein pursuant to Rule 3211 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules on the ground that there is an existing order dated February 14, 1964 and filed in the Ulster County Clerk’s Office on February 19, 1964, discharging the Mechanic’s Lien dated December 23, 1963 upon which the alleged cause of action of the plaintiff against the defendant, Kingston Plaza, Inc. is based.”
It appears: that the action was commenced against the moving defendant by the service of a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Niagara Falls Power Co. v. WhiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
- Brainard v. . County of KingsNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Maneely v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
- Sheffield v. EarlyNew York Supreme Court · 1893
- Ball & Wood Co. v. Jonathan Clark & Sons Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Planned Consumer Marketing, Inc. v. Coats & Clark, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- City of Schenectady v. New York State Off-Track Pari-Mutuel Betting CommissionNew York Supreme Court · 1972