In re Donner-Hanna Coke Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Davis, J.:
The appellant has sought relief because assessed for property it does not own. The principal facts have been stated in a prior decision of this court. (See People ex rel. Donner-Union Coke Corporation v. Burke, 204 App. Div. 557.)
In 1921 property consisting of buildings and equipment in the city of Buffalo owned by the United States was assessed to petitioner, together with land owned by the latter upon which the buildings and equipment were erected. The petitioner by certiorari reviewed the assessment. The order of the Special Term entered April 25, 1922, declared such assessment…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Van Brocklin v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- People v. WeaverSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- National Bank of Chemung v. City of ElmiraNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- United States Trust Co. v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Chapman v. . the City of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- People ex rel. Gale v. Tax CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
- Lutheran Church in America v. City or New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967
- Tartaglia v. McLaughlinNew York Supreme Court · 1947
- United States v. City of BuffaloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.