Legal Opinion

Radermecher v. FMC Corp.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 18, 1985No. C3-85-478PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SIMONETT, Justice.

In this appeal, the employee, working for a single employer, contracted cancer as a result of treatments for dermatitis resulting from his employment. The issues raised are whether the cancer condition is compensable, which of several insurers is liable, what should be the compensation rate, and whether the internal organs statute applies. We affirm the rulings made below.

Employee, Florian H. Radermecher, worked for 32 years for his employer, FMC Corporation (and its predecessor Northern Ordnance), from 1951 to his retirement on August 3, 1983, at age 62 for ill…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hengemuhle v. Long Prairie JayceesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Fink v. Cold Spring Granite Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  3. Abram v. Art Goebel FordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. Flowers v. Consolidated Container Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  5. Langlais v. Superior Plating, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. American Filtrona Co. v. HanfordCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1993
  2. Suburban Hospital, Inc. v. KirsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  3. Quam v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  4. Green v. Boise Cascade Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Corbett v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API