Legal Opinion
Quam v. State
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 8, 1986No. CO-85-1264PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WAHL, Justice.
This appeal from a decision of the Workers Compensation Court of Appeals raises the question of whether an attorney should receive immediate payment of fees for legal services rendered in obtaining compensation for permanent partial disability even though payment of such compensation to the employee is deferred. It also raises jurisdictional and substantive issues regarding the award of additional compensation to the employee pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 176.081, subd. 7a(1984). We reverse the decision of the Workers Compensation Court of Appeals insofar as it delayed…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Breimhorst v. BeckmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- McCannel v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- State Ex Rel. Spurck v. Civil Service BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- Wulff v. Tax Court of AppealsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- MacK v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Albe v. LOUISIANA WORKERS'COMPENSATION CORP.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
- Alaska Public Interest Research Group v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- Irwin v. Surdyk's LiquorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- Green v. BMW of North America, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- Deschampe v. Arrowhead Tree ServiceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.