Legal Opinion

American Filtrona Co. v. Hanford

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided March 30, 1993No. Record No. 0533-92-2PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BENTON, J.

American Filtrona Company appeals from an award entered by the Workers’ Compensation Commission finding American responsible for the cost of medical treatment for Sue E. Hanford’s hepatitis condition. The Commission ruled that Hanford’s hepatitis, contracted in 1981, was a compensable consequence of an injury by accident suffered in 1978. American contends that the Commission erred: (1) in its first review opinion when it reversed the deputy commissioner’s order dismissing Hanford’s claim as barred by the time limitation provided by Code § 65.1-87 (now Code § 65.2-601), and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. MusickCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1989
  2. Steinman v. Clinchfield Coal Corp.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 1917
  3. Leonard v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Virginia · 1977
  4. Bartholow Drywall Co., Inc. v. HillCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1991
  5. Radermecher v. FMC Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Allen & Rocks, Inc. v. BriggsCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1998
  2. Berglund Chevrolet, Inc. v. LandrumCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2004
  3. Farmington Country Club, Inc. v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2005
  4. Suburban Hospital, Inc. v. KirsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  5. Uninsured Employer's Fund v. ThrushSupreme Court of Virginia · 1998

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API