Legal Opinion

Temple-Inland Forest Products Corporation v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 13, 1993No. 92-4394PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge:

This case turns on the construction of a 58-year-old deed under Texas law. In 1935, Temple-Inland’s predecessor sold land in East Texas to the United States, reserving the mineral rights. This reservation was to expire in 1985, subject to extension on limited areas around commercial production. Temple’s right to retain tracts that have become inactive since 1985 is now disputed. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Temple. We disagree with the district court’s interpretation of the deed, and reverse.

The facts are undisputed. By…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Coker v. CokerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Luckel v. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Humphreys-Mexia Co. v. GammonTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Altman v. BlakeTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Garrett v. Dils CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1957

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Resolution Trust Corp. v. CramerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  2. Stinnett v. Colorado Interstate Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
  3. Corley v. Entergy Corp.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2003
  4. Hart v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1996
  5. P. Bordages-Account B, L.P. v. Air Products, L.P.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2004

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API