Legal Opinion

Hart v. United States

District Court, E.D. Texas

Decided September 27, 1996No. 1:95CV735PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

FOLSOM, District Judge.

CAME- ON TO BE HEARD THIS DAY Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. This Court after reviewing the motion, response, supporting affidavits, and pleadings on file, finds that the motion is well taken.

I. BACKGROUND

This is a declaratory judgment action in which T. Alan Hart, Plaintiff requests the Court to construe the legal effect of a flow-age easement granted to the United States of America, Defendant. Plaintiff seeks a declaration allowing him to construct a structure for human habitation above elevation 179 feet means sea level (“m.s.l.”) without interfering…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Topalian v. EhrmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  4. Luckel v. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Mollie Ann Dunn v. State Farm Fire & Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Terrill v. Tuckness, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
  2. Valley View Development, Inc. v. United States Ex Rel. United States Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2010
  3. Floyd v. Fischer (In Re Pearson)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2008
  4. United States v. Austin Two Tracts, L.P.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2002
  5. Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company v. Markel Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API