Legal Opinion

Stinnett v. Colorado Interstate Gas Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided September 8, 2000No. 97-10882PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIENER, Circuit Judge:

Grounded in mineral exploration, development, and production in the panhandle of Texas with a history almost as long as that State’s oil and gas industry itself, the case that engenders the instant appeal requires interpretation of contractual provisions contained in several agreements and application of such interpretation to facts that are either undisputed or have been determined by a jury. The plaintiffs (collectively, “the Mastersons”), as lessors and successors in interest to lessors of minerals in the West Panhandle Field (the “Field”), instigated this litigation…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. ShipmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  2. Schlumberger Technology Corp. v. SwansonTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  3. HECI Exploration Co. v. NeelTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Reilly v. Rangers Management, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Lopez v. Muñoz, Hockema & Reed, L.L.P.Texas Supreme Court · 2000

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Reliant Energy Services, Inc. v. Enron Canada Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
  2. State of Texas v. American Tobacco CoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
  3. P C L Civil Constructors, Inc. v. Arch Insurance CCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
  4. Hydro Resources Corp. v. GrayNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Mississippi Power Company, Petitioner-Cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent-Cross-PetitionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API