Legal Opinion

Fitzgerald v. Thompson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 16, 1992PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for fraud, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Gurahian, J.), entered October 19, 1990, as granted that branch of the *558defendant’s cross motion which was to dismiss the action as barred by the Statute of Limitations.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The plaintiffs’ cause of action accrued sometime in late 1984 in Georgia where the investment activity and the fraud which is the subject of the action allegedly occurred (see, Knieriemen v Bache…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Martin v. Julius Dierck Equipment Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Shipman v. Horizon CorporationSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  3. Knieriemen v. Bache Halsey Stuart Shields Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  4. Doyon v. BascomAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
  5. Isenberg v. RainierAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ledwith v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. Eaton v. KeyserAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API