Isenberg v. Rainier
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendants, John T. Rainier and another, from an order of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 12th day of January, 1911, reversing a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York in favor of the defendants' and directing a new trial.
1Opinion of the Court
Scott, J.:
Appeal by defendants from a determination' of the Appellate .Term reversing a judgment of the Municipal Court in favor of defendants and granting a new trial. The appellants have filed the necessary stipulation for judgment absolute in favor of plaintiff if the. determination be affirmed. The plaintiff is a resident of the State of Connecticut.^ The action is .upon a sealed instrument, executed in the State of Connecticut, and known in that State as a special bail bond, being *257conditioned for the payment by one Horace C. Flanigan of any judgment .that might be rendered against him in…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Isenberg v. RainierAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1911
3Cited by32 opinions
- Jacobus v. . ColgateNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Irving Nat. Bank v. LawCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
- Knieriemen v. Bache Halsey Stuart Shields Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Dar El-Bina Engineering & Contracting Co. v. Republic of IraqDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Baker v. CohnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.