Legal Opinion
Martin v. Julius Dierck Equipment Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided January 18, 1978PublishedCited by 177 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Jasen, J.
The novel question posed by this appeal is whether, for purposes of CPLR 202, plaintiffs causes of action for personal injury accrued in the jurisdiction in which he was injured or *587in the jurisdiction in which the vehicle alleged to have caused the injury was delivered.
Plaintiff, a resident of the District of Columbia, was injured in Arlington, Virginia, on June 7, 1968, at the warehouse of his employer, Western Electric, when a forklift truck he was operating allegedly malfunctioned, throwing him from the vehicle. The forklift was manufactured by defendant…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Micallef v. Miehle Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Codling v. PagliaNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Enco Associates, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Victorson v. Bock Laundry Machine Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Goldberg v. Kollsman Instrument Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1963
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by177 opinions
- Becker v. SchwartzNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Boudreau v. BaughmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- Denny v. Ford Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
- In Re "Agent Orange" Product Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1984
- Board of Education v. Sargent, Webster, Crenshaw & FolleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
172 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.