Legal Opinion

Newport Building Corp. v. City of Santa Ana

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 13, 1962No. Civ. 6877PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPARD, J.—

This is an appeal by defendant from a judgment in favor of plaintiff for refund of fees allegedly paid under coercion.

Pacts

Plaintiff owned land in defendant city. It prepared and graded said land for subdivision purposes, subdivided it into tracts of residential building lots, and built thereon for purposes of sale, single family residences. Tract 3296 consisted of 97 lots. On May 3,1954, defendant enacted chapter 3 of article IX, under the title 1 ‘ Subdivision regulations, ’ ’ in which chapter is provided a detailed set of regulations covering design, improvement, advisory…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Brumagim v. TillinghastCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
  2. City of Glendale v. TrondsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Union League Club v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Flynn v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Cuzner v. the California ClubCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Friends of Lake Arrowhead v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  2. Pratt v. AdamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. The Pines v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Santa Clara County Contractors & Builders Ass'n v. City of Santa ClaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. TracFone Wireless, Inc. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API