Legal Opinion

Union League Club v. Johnson

California Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 1941No. Sac. 5325PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

The State Treasurer complains that the superior court in rendering a judgment for the amount of taxes paid by the respondent under protest, improperly construed the Retail Sales Tax Act (Stats. 1933, p. 2599; Deering’s Gen. Laws, Act 8493). The taxpayer was allowed to recover upon the theory that this act, as in effect at the time the assessment was made, does not include a bona fide social club.

The respondent is a non-profit corporation, organized for social and political purposes. It occupies a building in San Francisco in which it maintains all the facilities of a modern club, including…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. WeitzelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Loew's Inc. v. ByramCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Cuzner v. the California ClubCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  4. County of Ada v. Boise Commercial ClubIdaho Supreme Court · 1911
  5. State Ex Rel. City Loan & Savings Co. v. ZellnerOhio Supreme Court · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. People v. Lance W.California Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Jimmy Swaggart Ministries v. Board of Equalization of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Coca-Cola Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Clements v. T. R. Bechtel Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Bermite Powder Co. v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API