Legal Opinion

Flynn v. City & County of San Francisco

California Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1941No. S. F. 15996PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

Plaintiff, upon two hundred fifty-five assigned causes of action, brought this suit against the city and county of San Francisco to recover various sums paid as and for license taxes during the years 1931 to 1935, inclusive. The judgment was for the plaintiff, and the defendant city and county has appealed.

For the sake of brevity on the trial of this action it was stipulated and the court found that plaintiff’s assignors could properly be segregated into three groups, classified according to ownership of the following vehicles: “miscellaneous trucks,” “trucks for hire,” and “taxicabs”.…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Ward v. Board of Commr's of Love Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Dawson v. Kentucky Distilleries & Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. West Coast Advertising Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Brumagim v. TillinghastCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Jacks v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Fox Bakersfield Theatre Corp. v. City of BakersfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Arriaga v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Greif v. DulleaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  5. Weaver v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API