Legal Opinion

State v. Crail

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 2001No. 23007PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

ACOBA, J.

We hold, in this appeal by Defendant-Appellant Darrell Crail (Defendant) from a November 18, 1999 judgment of conviction and sentence for violations of Hawai'i Revised Statutes (HRS) § 712-1243 (Supp.1999) (Count I) and HRS § 329-43.5 (1993) (Count II), that the first circuit court (the court)1 did not err in denying his motion to dismiss for preindictment delay. Contrary to his contentions, we conclude that Defendant did not demonstrate substantial prejudice from his alleged loss of memory or from the loss of potential witnesses and evidence, see State v.…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. State v. ArceoHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. PineroHawaii Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. KinnaneHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. KlingeHawaii Supreme Court · 2000

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. JosephHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. RodriguesHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. LongHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. MartinezHawaii Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State v. KeliiheleuaHawaii Supreme Court · 2004

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API