Legal Opinion

State v. Long

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 2002No. 23473PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

ACOBA, J.

We hold that, while an objection of “insufficient foundation” is generally not adequate to preserve the objection for appeal, the basis for the objection in this case was evident from the context in which it was made and, thus, came within an exception to the general rule.

In a jury trial, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Dewitt Long (Petitioner) was convicted and found guilty of Count III, Theft in the Second Degree, Hawai'i Revised Statutes (HRS) § 708-831(l)(a) (1993), and Count IV, Promoting a Dangerous Drug in the Third Degree, HRS § 712-1243 (1993), of the…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. State v. WallaceHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. KimHawaii Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. FoxHawaii Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Tooley v. . BaconNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  5. Hedges v. ConderSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. May v. SprynczynatykNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. Fitzwater.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. Schnabel.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2012
  4. State v. ManewaHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. Bruce.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2017

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API