Legal Opinion

State v. Will

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1983No. 5908-PRPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAYS, Justice.

Appellee, Norma Jean Will, was charged with unlawful possession of a dangerous drug (Quaalude) with intent to sell. She filed a motion to suppress the physical evidence. The motion was heard and granted on June 28, 1982. The state appealed and the court of appeals ruled that the evidence was admissible. The opinion of the court of appeals, 137 Ariz. 50, 672 P.2d 1320 (1983), is vacated.

The issues raised in this appeal are: 1) whether the seizure and subsequent search of appellee’s vehicle was lawful under A.R.S. § 13-106(B)(4); and 2) whether there was probable cause to search…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. SardoArizona Supreme Court · 1975
  2. State v. DuganArizona Supreme Court · 1976
  3. State v. HeberlyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  4. Arnold v. CesareCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  5. State v. WillCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. MartinArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. ShekoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  3. State of Arizona v. Ronald James Sisco IICourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
  4. State v. BullingtonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  5. State v. MartinArizona Supreme Court · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API