Legal Opinion

State v. Heberly

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 17, 1978No. 1 CA-CR 3136PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FROEB, Chief Judge.

Appellants, Maurice Heberly, Jr. and Roger Thyfault, were convicted following a submission on stipulated evidence of possession of marijuana for sale, a felony. The court entered judgment and suspended the imposition of sentence on each appellant for three years and ordered that each pay a fine and surcharge of $244.00. In this appeal appellants question the validity of the search which produced the contraband, the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain a conviction for possession of marijuana for sale, and the propriety of the court’s simultaneously placing them on…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. United States v. ChadwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. JonesArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Vogel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1980
  3. State v. BurrisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  4. State v. OlsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  5. State v. WillArizona Supreme Court · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API