State v. Heberly
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FROEB, Chief Judge.
Appellants, Maurice Heberly, Jr. and Roger Thyfault, were convicted following a submission on stipulated evidence of possession of marijuana for sale, a felony. The court entered judgment and suspended the imposition of sentence on each appellant for three years and ordered that each pay a fine and surcharge of $244.00. In this appeal appellants question the validity of the search which produced the contraband, the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain a conviction for possession of marijuana for sale, and the propriety of the court’s simultaneously placing them on…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. ChadwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. JonesArizona Supreme Court · 1996
- Vogel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1980
- State v. BurrisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
- State v. OlsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
- State v. WillArizona Supreme Court · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.