Legal Opinion
State v. Sardo
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided December 19, 1975No. 3235PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GORDON, Justice:
The appellants, Ross Lynn Sardo and Richard Thomas Mandell, were convicted by the court sitting without a jury of the crime of possession of marijuana for sale. On appeal they contend that the case should be remanded for a voluntariness hearing on the basis of State v. Crowley, 111 Ariz. 308, 528 P.2d 834 (1974). In addition they contend the search of the motor home vehicle violated their Fourth Amendment rights to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures. We took jurisdiction of the case pursuant to Rule 47(e)(5), Rules of the Supreme Court. We affirm the judgment.
The…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Gouled v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- State v. PolandArizona Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. MinceyArizona Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. DossArizona Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. WileyArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. MillionArizona Supreme Court · 1978
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.