Legal Opinion
Arnold v. Cesare
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided March 29, 1983No. 2 CA-CIV 4497PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOWARD, Chief Judge.
This is a suit for declaratory judgment and for partition of real property. Appellants contend the trial court erred in refusing the admittance of certain evidence as being violative of the parol evidence rule and in not distributing certain of the realty in kind rather than mandating a sale. We affirm.
Vivian Arnold is Susan Cesare’s mother and Susan married Joseph Cesare in 1957. Vivian Arnold is a real estate broker as is Joseph Cesare. They formed a partnership to carry on a real estate business and various properties were acquired in the name of one or more of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pinnacle Peak Developers v. TRW Investment Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
- Sun Lodge, Inc. v. Ramada Development Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
- Cathemer v. HunterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
- Lusk Corporation v. BurgessArizona Supreme Court · 1958
3Cited by11 opinions
- Cuprite Mine Partners v. John AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Formento v. Encanto Business ParkCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
- L.K. Comstock & Co. v. United Engineers & Constructors Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Tucson Electric Power Co. v. Apache CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
- Amfac Distribution Corp. v. J.B. Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.