Legal Opinion

Horne v. J. H. Harvey Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 14, 2005No. A05A0684PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Adams, Judge.

Felicia Horne appeals from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of J. H. Harvey Company (“Harvey’s”) on her claim of malicious prosecution. Because we find that an issue of material fact exists as to whether Harvey’s acted with malice in pursuing the prosecution against Horne, we reverse.

“Summary judgment is appropriate when no genuine issues of material fact remain and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. We review a trial court’s summary judgment ruling de novo, construing the evidence and all reasonable inferences in a light most favorable to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Willis v. BrassellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  2. Smith v. Trust Co. BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  3. Desmond v. Troncalli MitsubishiCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  4. McGonagil v. TreadwellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  5. Vojnovic v. BrantsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Adams v. CarlisleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  2. McKissick v. S. O. A., Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  3. McKinney v. OkoyeNebraska Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Pombert v. Glock, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2016
  5. Brown v. CAMDEN COUNTY, GA.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API